Contemporary Issues in Law, Culture, and Globalization 3092-7250 1 Serial Number 3 2025 05 01 The Interaction Between International Law and Local Cultural Practices The Interaction Between International Law and Local Cultural Practices 50 59 EN Journal Article 2025 02 09 <p>This study aimed to explore how legal professionals, civil society actors, and community-based cultural intermediaries in Tehran understand, interpret, and negotiate the interaction between international legal norms and local cultural practices. This qualitative study was conducted using a conventional thematic analysis approach. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 24 participants in Tehran, including lawyers, legal consultants, academics, civil society workers, cultural mediators, and community representatives with experience in rights-related disputes involving cultural norms, family practices, minority identities, informal mediation, and access to justice. Participants were selected through purposive sampling followed by snowball recruitment. Interviews lasted between 45 and 80 minutes and continued until theoretical saturation was achieved. All interviews were audio-recorded with consent, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using NVivo software. Coding proceeded through open coding, axial categorization, and theme development. Trustworthiness was enhanced through member checking, peer debriefing, reflexive memo-writing, and maintenance of an audit trail. The analysis generated five main categories: translation of international norms into culturally meaningful language; coexistence and tension between formal law and informal cultural authority; cultural practices as both protective resources and sources of rights restriction; trust, procedural justice, and accessibility in rights implementation; and the role of intermediaries in bridging international law and local communities. Participants emphasized that international law was rarely rejected in principle, but its legitimacy depended on how it was communicated, localized, and institutionally implemented. They described cultural practices as dynamic rather than fixed, noting that local actors frequently reinterpret tradition in response to legal, social, and generational change. The findings suggest that the interaction between international law and local cultural practices should not be understood as a simple conflict between universalism and relativism. Instead, it is a negotiated process in which legal norms gain meaning through translation, trust-building, and culturally informed institutional practice. Rights-based implementation is more effective when it respects cultural identity while maintaining clear limits against discrimination, coercion, and harm.</p> https://journalcilcg.com/index.php/cilcg/article/download/25/18