<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName></PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle> Contemporary Issues in Law, Culture, and Globalization</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>3092-7250</Issn>
      <Volume>1</Volume>
      <Issue>Serial Number 4</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2025</Year>
        <Month>07</Month>
        <Day>01</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Legal Identity Formation Among Diaspora Communities: Culture, Recognition, and Belonging</ArticleTitle>
    <VernacularTitle>Legal Identity Formation Among Diaspora Communities: Culture, Recognition, and Belonging</VernacularTitle>
    <FirstPage>51</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>60</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2025</Year>
        <Month>04</Month>
        <Day>07</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <Abstract>&lt;p&gt;This study aimed to explore how members of diaspora communities in Tehran construct, negotiate, and reinterpret legal identity through cultural attachment, institutional recognition, and experiences of social belonging. This qualitative study was conducted using an exploratory phenomenological design. Participants included 24 adult members of diaspora communities residing in Tehran, selected through purposive and snowball sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews focused on migration history, legal documentation, institutional encounters, cultural belonging, and perceptions of recognition. Interviews continued until theoretical saturation was achieved; saturation was reached after the twenty-first interview, and three additional interviews were conducted to confirm thematic stability. All interviews were audio-recorded with participants’ consent, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. NVivo software was used to organize transcripts, generate initial codes, compare emerging categories, and develop final themes. Credibility was enhanced through member checking, peer review, prolonged engagement with the data, and maintenance of an audit trail. Analysis generated four main categories: legal identity as negotiated status, cultural memory and hybrid self-identification, institutional recognition and misrecognition, and belonging as conditional membership. Participants described legal identity not merely as citizenship, residence permits, or documentation, but as a lived and relational process shaped by bureaucratic encounters, family narratives, language, cultural practices, labor-market access, education, and everyday social interactions. While some participants viewed legal documents as a source of protection and legitimacy, others experienced them as fragile, temporary, or insufficient for social acceptance. The study suggests that legal identity formation among diaspora communities is a dynamic process situated between formal law, cultural continuity, social recognition, and affective belonging. Legal status alone does not guarantee belonging; rather, belonging emerges when institutional recognition is accompanied by social respect, cultural inclusion, and meaningful participation in public life.&lt;/p&gt;</Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">legal identity</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">diaspora communities</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">recognition</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">belonging</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">cultural identity</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">migration</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">qualitative research</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Tehran</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://journalcilcg.com/index.php/cilcg/article/download/32/24</ArchiveCopySource>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>
