Contemporary Issues in Law, Culture, and Globalization 3092-7250 2 Serial Number 7 2026 01 01 Legal Empowerment and Cultural Marginalization Among Vulnerable Groups Legal Empowerment and Cultural Marginalization Among Vulnerable Groups 11 21 EN Journal Article 2025 09 02 <p>This study aimed to explore how culturally marginalized and socially vulnerable groups in Tehran experience legal empowerment, institutional access, and everyday encounters with justice-related systems. This qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 24 participants from Tehran, including members of vulnerable groups and frontline legal or social-service actors working with marginalized communities. Participants were selected through purposive sampling with maximum variation in gender, age, social position, migration background, disability status, and exposure to legal institutions. Data collection continued until theoretical saturation was achieved at the twenty-first interview, followed by three additional interviews to confirm thematic consistency. Interviews focused on participants’ experiences of legal awareness, institutional trust, cultural recognition, documentation, discrimination, legal aid, and strategies for rights claiming. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed through thematic analysis using NVivo software. Credibility was enhanced through peer debriefing, iterative coding, memo-writing, and participant validation of selected interpretive summaries. Five main categories emerged from the analysis: legal invisibility and procedural distance; cultural stigma and institutional mistrust; rights translation through intermediaries; fragmented legal knowledge and unequal access to information; and conditional empowerment under economic and social constraint. Participants described formal law as simultaneously protective and inaccessible. Legal empowerment was rarely experienced as simple knowledge of rights; rather, it depended on whether participants could interpret legal language, overcome fear of authorities, obtain supportive mediation, and avoid social or economic retaliation. Community-based intermediaries, legal-aid workers, and trusted informal networks played a central role in transforming abstract legal rights into practical action. The findings suggest that legal empowerment among vulnerable groups requires more than formal legal awareness campaigns. It depends on culturally responsive institutions, accessible legal communication, trusted community-based support, and structural reforms that reduce the costs of rights claiming. Without attention to cultural marginalization, legal empowerment initiatives risk reproducing exclusion rather than expanding justice.</p> https://journalcilcg.com/index.php/cilcg/article/download/48/40