Contemporary Issues in Law, Culture, and Globalization 3092-7250 2 Serial Number 8 2026 03 01 Cultural Sensitivity in Legal Aid Services: Practitioner Experiences and Institutional Challenges Cultural Sensitivity in Legal Aid Services: Practitioner Experiences and Institutional Challenges 12 21 EN Journal Article 2026 11 25 <p>This study aimed to explore how legal aid practitioners in Tehran understand, negotiate, and implement cultural sensitivity in their everyday work with socially, linguistically, and economically diverse clients. This qualitative study used semi-structured interviews to examine practitioner experiences of culturally sensitive legal aid provision. Twenty-four participants were recruited from legal aid offices, non-governmental organizations, court-affiliated advisory units, and community-based legal counseling centers in Tehran through purposive and snowball sampling. Participants included legal aid lawyers, legal advisors, intake officers, and case coordinators with direct experience of working with vulnerable and culturally diverse clients. Interviews lasted between 45 and 75 minutes and continued until theoretical saturation was achieved. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. NVivo software was used to organize transcripts, develop initial codes, compare emerging categories, and refine themes. Credibility was strengthened through peer review, memo writing, member reflection, and maintaining an audit trail. Four main categories emerged from the analysis: cultural translation of legal problems, trust-building and reflexive communication, institutional barriers to culturally sensitive practice, and adaptive strategies under ethical tension. Practitioners described cultural sensitivity not as a separate professional skill but as a continuous interpretive process through which clients’ narratives, family obligations, gender norms, migration experiences, economic hardship, and distrust of institutions were translated into legally meaningful claims. However, high caseloads, limited consultation time, lack of trained interpreters, fragmented referral systems, and insufficient institutional training reduced practitioners’ capacity to provide culturally responsive services. Cultural sensitivity in legal aid requires more than individual goodwill or interpersonal empathy. It depends on institutional arrangements that support language access, practitioner training, reflective supervision, interdisciplinary cooperation, and flexible service design. Strengthening cultural responsiveness can improve client trust, procedural fairness, and the practical accessibility of legal aid services.</p> https://journalcilcg.com/index.php/cilcg/article/download/55/46