Contemporary Issues in Law, Culture, and Globalization 3092-7250 2 Serial Number 8 2026 03 01 Cultural Autonomy and State Law: Minority Governance Practices and Legal Recognition Cultural Autonomy and State Law: Minority Governance Practices and Legal Recognition 33 43 EN Journal Article 2026 11 27 <p>This study aimed to explore how minority communities in Tehran understand, practice, and negotiate cultural autonomy within the framework of state law and formal legal recognition. This qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 24 participants from Tehran who had direct experience with minority governance practices, cultural associations, community mediation, legal assistance, or rights-based advocacy. Participants were selected through purposive sampling, followed by theoretical sampling until theoretical saturation was reached. Interviews focused on community decision-making, informal governance, interaction with state institutions, perceived legal recognition, cultural rights, and tensions between collective autonomy and individual legal protection. Interviews were audio-recorded with consent, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using thematic analysis. NVivo software was used to organize transcripts, code data, compare emerging categories, and support the development of final themes. Analysis generated five main categories: autonomy as everyday community governance, conditional and uneven legal recognition, boundary negotiation between state law and community norms, protection of vulnerable insiders, and legal translation through mediation. Participants described cultural autonomy not as separation from state law but as a practical capacity to preserve language, rituals, dispute-resolution practices, kinship obligations, and community authority while remaining legally accountable to the state. However, recognition was experienced as partial, administrative, and dependent on the discretion of institutions and officials. Participants also emphasized that community governance requires internal accountability, especially where women, youth, migrants, or economically weaker members may be pressured by informal authority structures. The study shows that cultural autonomy is best understood as a negotiated legal and social practice rather than a fixed institutional status. Effective legal recognition requires flexible state frameworks that acknowledge minority governance practices while safeguarding equal citizenship, access to formal justice, and individual rights within minority communities.</p> https://journalcilcg.com/index.php/cilcg/article/download/57/48