Contemporary Issues in Law, Culture, and Globalization 3092-7250 2 Serial Number 8 2026 03 01 Cultural Change and Legal Reform in Globalized Societies: Normative Tensions and Institutional Adaptation Cultural Change and Legal Reform in Globalized Societies: Normative Tensions and Institutional Adaptation 55 65 EN Journal Article 2025 11 22 <p>This study aimed to explore how legal professionals, policymakers, and civil society actors in Tehran perceive the relationship between cultural change and legal reform in globalized societies, with particular attention to normative tensions and institutional adaptation. This qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 24 participants in Tehran, Iran. Participants included legal scholars, practicing lawyers, judicial actors, policy professionals, and civil society advocates with direct experience in legal reform, rights discourse, institutional practice, or socio-legal change. Participants were selected through purposive sampling and theoretical saturation guided the final sample size; saturation was reached after the twenty-first interview, and three additional interviews were conducted for confirmation. Data were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews lasting 45–75 minutes. Interviews were audio-recorded with consent, transcribed verbatim, anonymized, and analyzed through thematic analysis. NVivo software was used to organize transcripts, manage codes, compare categories, and support iterative theme development. Four main categories emerged from the data: global normative pressure and local cultural resistance; cultural translation of legal reform; institutional adaptation and selective implementation; and legitimacy, public trust, and everyday legal consciousness. Participants described legal reform as neither a simple importation of global norms nor a purely domestic cultural process. Instead, reform was understood as a negotiated field in which international legal standards, social expectations, professional interpretation, bureaucratic routines, and culturally rooted moral assumptions interact. The findings showed that institutional adaptation depends not only on formal legislative change but also on interpretive mediation, administrative capacity, professional training, and the perceived cultural legitimacy of reform. The study concludes that legal reform in globalized societies is most sustainable when it is culturally intelligible, institutionally supported, and normatively coherent. Reform efforts that ignore local meanings may generate resistance or symbolic compliance, whereas culturally translated and institutionally embedded reforms are more likely to produce practical legal change.</p> https://journalcilcg.com/index.php/cilcg/article/download/59/50