Cultural Change and Legal Reform in Globalized Societies: Normative Tensions and Institutional Adaptation
Keywords:
cultural change, legal reform, globalization, normative tension, institutional adaptation, legal cultureAbstract
This study aimed to explore how legal professionals, policymakers, and civil society actors in Tehran perceive the relationship between cultural change and legal reform in globalized societies, with particular attention to normative tensions and institutional adaptation. This qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 24 participants in Tehran, Iran. Participants included legal scholars, practicing lawyers, judicial actors, policy professionals, and civil society advocates with direct experience in legal reform, rights discourse, institutional practice, or socio-legal change. Participants were selected through purposive sampling and theoretical saturation guided the final sample size; saturation was reached after the twenty-first interview, and three additional interviews were conducted for confirmation. Data were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews lasting 45–75 minutes. Interviews were audio-recorded with consent, transcribed verbatim, anonymized, and analyzed through thematic analysis. NVivo software was used to organize transcripts, manage codes, compare categories, and support iterative theme development. Four main categories emerged from the data: global normative pressure and local cultural resistance; cultural translation of legal reform; institutional adaptation and selective implementation; and legitimacy, public trust, and everyday legal consciousness. Participants described legal reform as neither a simple importation of global norms nor a purely domestic cultural process. Instead, reform was understood as a negotiated field in which international legal standards, social expectations, professional interpretation, bureaucratic routines, and culturally rooted moral assumptions interact. The findings showed that institutional adaptation depends not only on formal legislative change but also on interpretive mediation, administrative capacity, professional training, and the perceived cultural legitimacy of reform. The study concludes that legal reform in globalized societies is most sustainable when it is culturally intelligible, institutionally supported, and normatively coherent. Reform efforts that ignore local meanings may generate resistance or symbolic compliance, whereas culturally translated and institutionally embedded reforms are more likely to produce practical legal change.
Downloads
References
Berman, P. S. (2007). Global legal pluralism. Southern California Law Review, 80, 1155–1238.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Ewick, P., & Silbey, S. S. (1998). The common place of law: Stories from everyday life. University of Chicago Press.
Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550789
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Halliday, T. C., & Carruthers, B. G. (2009). Bankrupt: Global lawmaking and systemic financial crisis. Stanford University Press.
Koh, H. H. (1996). Transnational legal process. Nebraska Law Review, 75(1), 181–207.
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Levitt, P., & Merry, S. (2009). Vernacularization on the ground: Local uses of global women’s rights in Peru, China, India and the United States. Global Networks, 9(4), 441–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2009.00263.x
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Merry, S. E. (1990). Getting justice and getting even: Legal consciousness among working-class Americans. University of Chicago Press.
Merry, S. E. (2006). Human rights and gender violence: Translating international law into local justice. University of Chicago Press.
Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G. M., & Ramirez, F. O. (1997). World society and the nation-state. American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), 144–181. https://doi.org/10.1086/231174
Risse, T., Ropp, S. C., & Sikkink, K. (Eds.). (1999). The power of human rights: International norms and domestic change. Cambridge University Press.
Santos, B. de S. (2002). Toward a new legal common sense: Law, globalization, and emancipation (2nd ed.). Butterworths LexisNexis.
Teubner, G. (1998). Legal irritants: Good faith in British law or how unifying law ends up in new divergencies. The Modern Law Review, 61(1), 11–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00125
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
