Gender, Culture, and Legal Reform: Women’s Rights in Transitional Societies
Keywords:
gender, culture, legal reform, women’s rights, transitional societies, access to justice, qualitative researchAbstract
This study aimed to explore how women, legal practitioners, and civil-society actors in Tehran interpret the relationship between gender norms, cultural expectations, and legal reform concerning women’s rights in a transitional socio-legal context. This qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 24 participants in Tehran, Iran. Participants were selected through purposive and maximum-variation sampling to include women with lived experience of legal disputes, lawyers, legal consultants, social workers, women’s rights advocates, and community-based professionals familiar with gender-related legal issues. Data collection continued until theoretical saturation was reached. Interviews focused on perceptions of women’s rights, family law, access to justice, cultural legitimacy, institutional barriers, and the practical effects of legal reform. Interviews were audio-recorded with consent, transcribed verbatim, anonymized, and analyzed using thematic analysis. NVivo software was used to organize codes, compare categories, and refine themes. Trustworthiness was strengthened through member checking, peer debriefing, reflexive memo-writing, and an audit trail. Five main categories emerged from the analysis: legal reform as symbolic recognition but incomplete protection; culture as both a constraint and a resource; institutional gatekeeping and unequal access to justice; women’s negotiated agency within family and legal systems; and the need for culturally mediated, enforceable reform. Participants described legal reform as necessary but insufficient when social stigma, family pressure, economic dependency, inconsistent implementation, and limited legal literacy continued to restrict women’s ability to claim rights. At the same time, participants emphasized that cultural values could support reform when framed around dignity, family well-being, justice, and social responsibility. The findings suggest that women’s rights reform in transitional societies requires more than formal legal change. Effective reform depends on enforceable institutions, gender-sensitive legal services, culturally credible public education, and sustained participation by women and civil society. Reform becomes socially meaningful when legal equality is translated into accessible, trusted, and context-sensitive mechanisms of justice.
Downloads
References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Charrad, M. M. (2001). States and women’s rights: The making of postcolonial Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco. University of California Press.
Ewick, P., & Silbey, S. S. (1998). The common place of law: Stories from everyday life. University of Chicago Press.
Fraser, N. (2009). Scales of justice: Reimagining political space in a globalizing world. Columbia University Press.
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. doi:10.1177/1525822X05279903
Htun, M., & Weldon, S. L. (2012). The civic origins of progressive policy change: Combating violence against women in global perspective, 1975–2005. American Political Science Review, 106(3), 548–569. doi:10.1017/S0003055412000226
Kandiyoti, D. (1988). Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender & Society, 2(3), 274–290. doi:10.1177/089124388002003004
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. doi:10.1177/1049732315617444
Merry, S. E. (2006). Human rights and gender violence: Translating international law into local justice. University of Chicago Press.
Moghadam, V. M. (2005). Globalizing women: Transnational feminist networks. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge University Press.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research: A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349–357. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
Tripp, A. M. (2015). Women and power in postconflict Africa. Cambridge University Press.
United Nations General Assembly. (1979). Convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women. United Nations Treaty Series, 1249, 13.
UN Women. (2019). Progress of the world’s women 2019–2020: Families in a changing world. UN Women.
Waylen, G. (2007). Engendering transitions: Women’s mobilization, institutions and gender outcomes. Oxford University Press.
World Bank. (2026). Women, business and the law 2026. World Bank.
Downloads
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
