Legal Empowerment and Cultural Marginalization Among Vulnerable Groups

Authors

    Reza Shahbazi Department of Cultural Studies, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
    Amir Ahmadi * Department of Family Law, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran. amir.ahmadi.fam@gmail.com

Keywords:

legal empowerment, cultural marginalization, vulnerable groups, access to justice, legal consciousness, qualitative research, Tehran

Abstract

This study aimed to explore how culturally marginalized and socially vulnerable groups in Tehran experience legal empowerment, institutional access, and everyday encounters with justice-related systems. This qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 24 participants from Tehran, including members of vulnerable groups and frontline legal or social-service actors working with marginalized communities. Participants were selected through purposive sampling with maximum variation in gender, age, social position, migration background, disability status, and exposure to legal institutions. Data collection continued until theoretical saturation was achieved at the twenty-first interview, followed by three additional interviews to confirm thematic consistency. Interviews focused on participants’ experiences of legal awareness, institutional trust, cultural recognition, documentation, discrimination, legal aid, and strategies for rights claiming. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed through thematic analysis using NVivo software. Credibility was enhanced through peer debriefing, iterative coding, memo-writing, and participant validation of selected interpretive summaries. Five main categories emerged from the analysis: legal invisibility and procedural distance; cultural stigma and institutional mistrust; rights translation through intermediaries; fragmented legal knowledge and unequal access to information; and conditional empowerment under economic and social constraint. Participants described formal law as simultaneously protective and inaccessible. Legal empowerment was rarely experienced as simple knowledge of rights; rather, it depended on whether participants could interpret legal language, overcome fear of authorities, obtain supportive mediation, and avoid social or economic retaliation. Community-based intermediaries, legal-aid workers, and trusted informal networks played a central role in transforming abstract legal rights into practical action. The findings suggest that legal empowerment among vulnerable groups requires more than formal legal awareness campaigns. It depends on culturally responsive institutions, accessible legal communication, trusted community-based support, and structural reforms that reduce the costs of rights claiming. Without attention to cultural marginalization, legal empowerment initiatives risk reproducing exclusion rather than expanding justice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Albiston, C. R., & Sandefur, R. L. (2013). Expanding the empirical study of access to justice. Wisconsin Law Review, 2013(1), 101–120.

Commission on Legal Empowerment of the Poor. (2008). Making the law work for everyone: Volume I: Report of the Commission on Legal Empowerment of the Poor. United Nations Development Programme.

Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.

Ewick, P., & Silbey, S. S. (1998). The common place of law: Stories from everyday life. University of Chicago Press.

Felstiner, W. L. F., Abel, R. L., & Sarat, A. (1980–1981). The emergence and transformation of disputes: Naming, blaming, claiming. Law & Society Review, 15(3/4), 631–654.

Galanter, M. (1974). Why the “haves” come out ahead: Speculations on the limits of legal change. Law & Society Review, 9(1), 95–160.

Golub, S. (2003). Beyond rule of law orthodoxy: The legal empowerment alternative. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Maru, V. (2006). Between law and society: Paralegals and the provision of justice services in Sierra Leone and worldwide. Yale Journal of International Law, 31(2), 427–476.

Merry, S. E. (2006a). Human rights and gender violence: Translating international law into local justice. University of Chicago Press.

Merry, S. E. (2006b). Human rights and transnational culture: Regulating gender violence through global law. Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 44(1), 53–75.

Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Harvard University Press.

OECD & Open Society Foundations. (2019). Legal needs surveys and access to justice. OECD Publishing.

Sandefur, R. L. (2016). What we know and need to know about the legal needs of the public. South Carolina Law Review, 67(2), 443–459.

Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Harvard University Press.

Task Force on Justice. (2019). Justice for all: Final report. Center on International Cooperation, New York University.

Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton University Press.

United Nations Development Programme. (2004). Access to justice: Practice note. United Nations Development Programme.

World Justice Project. (2019). Measuring the justice gap: A people-centered assessment of unmet justice needs around the world. World Justice Project.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-01

Submitted

2025-09-02

Revised

2025-12-11

Accepted

2025-12-20

How to Cite

Shahbazi, R., & Ahmadi, A. (2026). Legal Empowerment and Cultural Marginalization Among Vulnerable Groups. Contemporary Issues in Law, Culture, and Globalization, 2(1), 11-21. https://journalcilcg.com/index.php/cilcg/article/view/48

Similar Articles

1-10 of 47

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.